Suspend Maharlika fund? Makabayan solon says it’s better to scrap it
MANILA, Philippines — Instead of suspending the implementation of the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF), ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro believes the administration should totally junk the law as it is supposedly “flawed in so many levels.” Castro on Wednesday said that it would be better if President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. junked the MIF — the country’s first sovereign wealth fund (SWF) — due to concerns about the fund life of banks that would bankroll the program. Earlier, it was announced that Malacañang released a memorandum tasking agencies involved in the MIF to study the plans. READ: Marcos suspends Maharlika fund implementation “It would be better if President Marcos Jr. just scrapped the whole Maharlika law rather than just suspend it,” Castro said. “As Bayan Muna executive vice-president Carlos Isagani Zarate said last week, ‘the Marcos administration placed in grave danger the Land Bank of the Philippines (LandBank) and the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) respective capitals after the twin state-run depositary banks were required to finance the creation of the [MIF],” she added. According to Castro, Republic Act No. 11954, which contains the MIF, is flawed from the start because the country has no excess funds that can be tapped for this SWF. “Sa simula pa lang ay sablay na talaga ang Maharlika Investment Fund dahil wala namang tayong excess fund para dito. Pangalawa, ay mula pa sa pera ng bayan ang ipo-pondo dito sa halip na gamitin sa mga batayang serbisyo para sa mamamayan,” she said. (At the start, we have been saying that the Maharlika Investment Fund is flawed because we do not have excess funds for this. Second, we would use money from the country’s coffers, which should have been used for services aimed at helping the people.) “Pangatlo, maski ang pagsertipika dito as urgent ay di sumunod sa proseso. Pang-apat, mga appointee pa din ng pangulo ang mamamahala dito at bukas ito sa korapsyon,” she added. (Third, even the certification of the bill as urgent did not follow the processes. Fourth, the managers are still presidential appointees, which is open to corruption.) Last July 18, Marcos signed the said MIF bill into law, which has been controversial for many reasons. When it was first filed at the House last November 2022, critics questioned why the then-proposed MIF would tap into pension funds, particularly those from the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) and the Social
Disclaimer : We make no assurance about the completeness and accuracy of the content of this website. All news on this website is collected from various sources hence information may or may not be true. Money Nations does not verify the reliability of the content published. We do not accept any accountability for loss or damage occurred as a result of reliability on the content of this website.